Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andy Roddick vs John Van Lottum Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Roddick vs Lottum analysis and find out who is favored!
Andy Roddick vs John Van Lottum Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Roddick 0 - 0 Lottum
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roddick has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lottum has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roddick, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lottum has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Roddick has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lottum has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Roddick has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lottum winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Roddick has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 86/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 75/ 43). Lottum has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roddick has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lottum has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roddick has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lottum has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Roddick has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lottum has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
41
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
48
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andy Roddick | John Van Lottum |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Andy Roddick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats 
Juan Martin Del Potro
Player
Andy Roddick
70%
(
86 of
123)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
15
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
69 of
86)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
64 of
83)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
32 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
42 of
128)
133
Total Points Won
118
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
Fabio Fognini
67%
(
87 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
123)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
8
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
42 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
123)
133
Total Points Won
120
|
7-5 7-6(1) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
Bernard Tomic
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
13
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
Rhyne Williams
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
20
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
52 of
58)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
17 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Andy Roddick
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
James Blake
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Andy Roddick
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Andy Roddick
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
14
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
Martin Klizan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andy Roddick
Player
Gilles Muller
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
18
Aces
20
4
Double Faults
10
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
42 of
48)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
John Van Lottum Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Wayne Arthurs
Player
John van Lottum
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
15
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Ricardo Mello
56%
(
69 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
92)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
56 of
133)
128
Total Points Won
128
|
3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
John van Lottum
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Lars Uebel
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Jean-Rene Lisnard
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roddick Vs Lottum Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
